Colorado State University

Decontamination of a Fume Hood Contaminated with Tritiated Thymidin

Download

K. J. Walter, A. E. Draine, and T. E. Johnson Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO

Contaminated Fume Hood

CSU LogoBackground

  • Contaminated in 2003 with Tritiated-Thymidine
  • Inadvertently volatilized
  • From 2003 to 2007, have been attempting decon
    • Still contaminated after almost monthly attempts
    • Tried both soap/water and Radiacwash
  • RSO will not release until counts are at background

Proposed Solution

Polymer-hydrogel strippable-coating from CBI Polymers. (CBI)

Process

  • Spot tests demonstrated to RSO that gel was capable of removing tritiated-thymidine contamination
  • Gained approval to continue decon efforts
  • Removed expendable materials and put in radioactive waste
  • Painted hood with 2 formulations of gel for comparison
    • ½ Decon 1101
    • ½ Decon 1101EXP
  • Gel applied and allowed to set for 3 days

Materials

  • Tried two formulations in development
    • Decon Gel 1101
      • Polymer B + Thixotrope A
    • Decon 1001EXP
      • Polymer B + Thixotrope B
  • Multiple surfaces of hood
    • Glass
    • Painted metal
    • Cement board countertop
    • Copper pipe

Decon 1101EXP vs. DeconGel™ 1101

 

Application & Removal

Decon 1101EXP DeconGel™ 1101

• More difficult to paint even thickness

• Horizontal surfaces:

- Thick, uneven application

• Vertical & inverted surfaces :

- Thick, uneven application

- Dripped less

• Easier to paint

• Horizontal surfaces:

- Thick or thin, even application

• Vertical & inverted surfaces:

- Thinner application

- Dripped more

• Removed in smaller brittle pieces

• Thicker films Easier to peel

• Longer dry time

• Thinner films

• Difficult to peel - tended to tear

• Removed in large pliable sheet

• Thicker films Easier to peel

• Longer dry time

• Thinner films Peeled satisfactorily

Scintillation Wipe Map

12-14 = Inside ceiling; 15-17 = Inside hood window center; 18-20 = water pipe; 21 = floor

Area # Before decon 3 days after 1 month later % removed 11 Weeks later % removed
1 30 0 0 100 0 100
2 261 0 0 100 0 100
3 89 0 0 100 0 100
4 21 0 0 100 0 100
5 1180 0 0 100 0 100
6 1920 11 47 98 0 100
7 202 0 0 100 0 100
8 754 0 0 100 0 100
9 1184 0 0 100 0 100
10 33 0 0 100 0 100
11 209 0 0 100 0 100
12 154 0 0 100 0 100
13 341 0 0 100 0 100
14 758 21 19 98 0 100
15 0 0 0 100 0 100
16 0 0 0 100 0 100
Paper wipes counted for 5 min using dark-adapted Beckmann Liquid Scintillation Counter Reported in cpm / 100cm2 above background

Conclusions

  • Decon Gel 1101 was preferred for application and removal ease
  • Decon of tritiated-thymidine accomplished
  • Leaching controlled after one month
  • Hood checked again 11 weeks later
  • Additional coat was applied to area still contaminated
  • Leaching still controlled

Questions?

Ken Walter
(970) 491-0554
ken.walter@gmail.com

Dr. Tom Johnson
(970) 491-0563
tj@colostate.edu

 

 

"));