Colorado State University
Decontamination of a Fume Hood Contaminated with Tritiated Thymidin
K. J. Walter, A. E. Draine, and T. E. Johnson Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO
Contaminated Fume Hood
Background
- Contaminated in 2003 with Tritiated-Thymidine
- Inadvertently volatilized
- From 2003 to 2007, have been attempting decon
- Still contaminated after almost monthly attempts
- Tried both soap/water and Radiacwash
- RSO will not release until counts are at background
Proposed Solution
Polymer-hydrogel strippable-coating from CBI Polymers. (CBI)

Process
- Spot tests demonstrated to RSO that gel was capable of removing tritiated-thymidine contamination
- Gained approval to continue decon efforts
- Removed expendable materials and put in radioactive waste
- Painted hood with 2 formulations of gel for comparison
- ½ Decon 1101
- ½ Decon 1101EXP
- Gel applied and allowed to set for 3 days
Materials
- Tried two formulations in development
- Decon Gel 1101
- Polymer B + Thixotrope A
- Decon 1001EXP
- Polymer B + Thixotrope B
- Decon Gel 1101
- Multiple surfaces of hood
- Glass
- Painted metal
- Cement board countertop
- Copper pipe
Decon 1101EXP vs. DeconGel™ 1101
Application & Removal
| Decon 1101EXP | DeconGel™ 1101 |
• More difficult to paint even thickness • Horizontal surfaces: - Thick, uneven application • Vertical & inverted surfaces : - Thick, uneven application - Dripped less |
• Easier to paint • Horizontal surfaces: - Thick or thin, even application • Vertical & inverted surfaces: - Thinner application - Dripped more |
| • Removed in smaller brittle pieces • Thicker films Easier to peel • Longer dry time • Thinner films • Difficult to peel - tended to tear |
• Removed in large pliable sheet • Thicker films Easier to peel • Longer dry time • Thinner films Peeled satisfactorily |
Scintillation Wipe Map
12-14 = Inside ceiling; 15-17 = Inside hood window center; 18-20 = water pipe; 21 = floor
| Area # | Before decon | 3 days after | 1 month later | % removed | 11 Weeks later | % removed |
| 1 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 2 | 261 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 3 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 5 | 1180 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 6 | 1920 | 11 | 47 | 98 | 0 | 100 |
| 7 | 202 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 8 | 754 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 9 | 1184 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 10 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 11 | 209 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 12 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 13 | 341 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 14 | 758 | 21 | 19 | 98 | 0 | 100 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Paper wipes counted for 5 min using dark-adapted Beckmann Liquid Scintillation Counter Reported in cpm / 100cm2 above background | ||||||
Conclusions
- Decon Gel 1101 was preferred for application and removal ease
- Decon of tritiated-thymidine accomplished
- Leaching controlled after one month
- Hood checked again 11 weeks later
- Additional coat was applied to area still contaminated
- Leaching still controlled
Questions?
Ken Walter
(970) 491-0554
ken.walter@gmail.com
Dr. Tom Johnson
(970) 491-0563
tj@colostate.edu